<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mecandes' Humble Abode &#187; Linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mecandes.poverellomedia.com/tag/linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mecandes.poverellomedia.com</link>
	<description>replete with games, movies, books, and other guilty pleasures.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:56:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Windows Vista vs. Mac OS X vs. Ubuntu Linux</title>
		<link>http://mecandes.poverellomedia.com/blog/windows-vista-vs-mac-os-x-vs-ubuntu-linux/</link>
		<comments>http://mecandes.poverellomedia.com/blog/windows-vista-vs-mac-os-x-vs-ubuntu-linux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mecandes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mecandes.poverellomedia.com/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the last few months, I&#8217;ve had the chance to work with the latest versions of  all three of the major operating systems; Windows Vista (SP1), Mac OS X  (Leopard), and Ubuntu Linux (Hardy Heron).
To me, Windows Vista (yes,  Vista), is still far and away the winner.
Now, it&#8217;s not because I&#8217;ve  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-136" title="Unholy union of Windows, Mac OS and Linux" src="http://mecandes.poverellomedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/n844665267_3261940_40911.jpg" alt="Unholy union of Windows, Mac OS and Linux" width="249" height="300" />In the last few months, I&#8217;ve had the chance to work with the latest versions of  all three of the major operating systems; Windows Vista (SP1), Mac OS X  (Leopard), and Ubuntu Linux (Hardy Heron).</p>
<p>To me, Windows Vista (yes,  Vista), is still far and away the winner.</p>
<p>Now, it&#8217;s not because I&#8217;ve  never used anything else. I&#8217;ve been around since before the MS-DOS days, and  have dipped my toes in the waters of other operating systems, such as GEOS, the  classic Mac OS, OS/2 Warp and Amiga Workbench up to AmigaOS 3 even.</p>
<p>I  definitely don&#8217;t consider myself a Microsoft fan boy (no XHTML/CSS programmer  is, that&#8217;s for sure) &#8212; but I don&#8217;t hate them just because it&#8217;s fashionable to  bash them, either. I&#8217;m getting kind of tired of folks in the media claiming that  Vista is a disaster not because they have used it, but because that&#8217;s what they  hear the &#8220;cool kids&#8221; are saying.</p>
<p><strong>Linux</strong>: To me, there is only one  appeal here, summed up entirely in the word &#8220;Free.&#8221; Everyone acknowledges that  Linux is not at all user friendly, and the Ubuntu release is the most popular  precisely because it brands itself as being &#8220;Linux for human beings.&#8221; Frankly,  using Linux is like going back to the Windows 3.1 days, where a clunky GUI has  been pasted over top of a DOS command line. The GNOME interface simply mimics  Windows XP, and doesn&#8217;t offer any particular innovations. You definitely need to  be a dedicated computer geek to find your way around, and even then you can  expect to spend hours pouring through user forums for solutions to problems  (often only to find out the solution you discovered only works with a different  flavour of Linux). Most of your hardware isn&#8217;t going to be 100% supported, and  the only really mainstream application ported to Linux is the Firefox browser;  everything else is free software that you&#8217;ve never heard of. When you use it,  you get a definite &#8220;pioneering&#8221; feel; it&#8217;s like the Wild West. I&#8217;m sure that  appeals to some people &#8212; and at one time it would have appealed to me &#8212; but  now, I just don&#8217;t have time for all that messing around. If all you really need  is Firefox and Open Office, you might be able to survive on Linux without too  much frustration&#8230; maybe.</p>
<p><strong>Mac OS X</strong>: The Mac OS has always had an  attractive simplicity. Program files are kept neat and tidy and installing  software is pretty effortless. If the Mac OS and Windows each had an equal  market share, I would easily recommend the Mac to new or novice computer users  over Windows. But unfortunately, therein lies the problem: Mac does not have the  same installed base &#8212; far less than 1 out of 10 computers is a Mac. What that  means is less developers and less support. Less software choices means you are  overly reliant on Mac itself to provide the applications. (Luckily, their  applications are simple, flashy, and people like them.) However, the simplicity  sometimes feels &#8220;optionless,&#8221; as if Steve Jobs is personally dictating what I am  allowed and not allowed to do. For me, since the Adobe Creative Suite software  is identical now between Mac and PC, I can be equally productive on either OS.  The trouble is, I do not like Mac&#8217;s vaunted &#8220;Aqua&#8221; GUI. Apple&#8217;s stubborn  one-button-mouse philosophy has always impaired it&#8217;s OS&#8217; progress, and a lot of  the interface design seems intended <em>just to be different</em> from Windows,  often impairing usability. I really dislike the way the standard controls are  not attached to the application window, but rather all use the same menu bar, so  that you find yourself thinking you are looking at one program&#8217;s controls  without realizing the focus is on a different program&#8217;s window. The dull flat  brushed metal window frames contrast so glaringly with the glowing candy gel  buttons and controls as to be distracting. I guess people thought that was cool  back in 2000, but to me it&#8217;s always looked kind of ridiculous.</p>
<p><strong>Windows  Vista</strong>: This is the biggest change for the Windows operating system in years.  &#8220;They&#8221; say that Vista is buggy, slow, and to be avoided at all costs.  Personally, I have no idea what &#8220;they&#8221; are talking about&#8230; my experience with  Vista has been fantastic. A lot of things are different &#8212; the new setup  definitely takes some getting used to &#8212; and I suspect that a lot of people who  gripe about Vista do so because they are the kind of people who are resistant to  change. But after having some time with it, I find I am able to get around  faster and more intuitively than any previous operating system. The &#8220;Aero&#8221; GUI  is gorgeous; people say that it copies the Mac, but truthfully it leaves the  decade-old Mac Aqua look far in the dust. Truthfully, I thought the transparency  and shadow window effects were just going to be distracting eye candy; but in  practice, I love how it helps define the window hierarchy on your desktop as you  work. Gradients and shading in the Aero GUI help define buttons without being  distracting, and the popular gel button look is not overused. Windows Media  Center interfaces beautifully with my Xbox 360 to bring all of our media to the  television with absolute ease. The Vista versions of the Office applications  have undergone perhaps the most radical upgrades of all; Microsoft Word and  Outlook are far more usable now. (Try opening Word 2007 and slowly moving your  mouse along the controls at the top of the screen&#8230; watch how the interface  subtly highlights things&#8230; awesome.)</p>
<p>Personally, I recommend Vista  highly to anyone who is buying a new machine. Don&#8217;t let anyone tell you &#8220;you  should downgrade it to XP.&#8221; I understand that some people have had trouble  upgrading old machines to Vista; but that&#8217;s true any time you install any new  operating system on an older machine (though I had no trouble upgrading my HP  purchased in fall 2006). If you&#8217;re getting a new machine, where Vista is  pre-installed and all the hardware is fully supported, you&#8217;re going to be very  pleased. Just give a few solid working days to get used to the changes, and keep  your mind open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mecandes.poverellomedia.com/blog/windows-vista-vs-mac-os-x-vs-ubuntu-linux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
